Breaking News

Turn on more accessible mode

Turn off more accessible mode

Skip Ribbon Commands

Skip to main content

Turn off Animations

Turn on Animations

Featured

Evaluating PDPM Clouded by Changes Resulting from COVID-19 Pandemic	<p>A new report by Avalere Health examining the impact of the changes resulting from the transition to the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) said more time and data are needed before any conclusions can be made on the impact of the new payment system due to the COVID-19 pandemic.<br></p><p>“The roll-out of the PDPM in October 2019 followed quickly by the COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges to understanding the extent to which increases in payment to skilled nursing facilities [SNFs] are due to the changes in the payment system versus changes in the patient populations served during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Avalere’s report said.<br></p><p>“Given the confounding effects of the pandemic and the new payment system, it is important to collect more data before evaluating the transition to the PDPM.”<br></p><p>The study comes at a time federal regulators are considering possible adjustments to the PDPM budget neutrality factor, which the report said are likely skewed by the impact of the pandemic on nursing home population shifts. A proposed adjustment from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would reduce PDPM payments to SNFs. <br></p><p>In reaction to the report, Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), said, “Without sufficient data prior to COVID-19, now is not the time to introduce another change to PDPM. Nursing home providers need reimbursement stability so they can remain focused on resident safety and quality care as they attempt to recover from the pandemic.”   <br></p><p>As background, Avalere noted that Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 was the first year of the new PDPM that CMS developed for SNFs. CMS designed PDPM to be budget neutral relative to payments under the previous Resource Utilization Groups Version IV (RUG-IV) payment system, report authors said. <br></p><p>“To maintain budget neutrality, any observed increases in payment under PDPM in FY 2020 are subject to a downward adjustment in future rates. In its assessment of budget neutrality, CMS estimated FY 2020 RUG-IV payments to be 5.3 percent higher than FY 2020 PDPM payments,” the report said. <br></p><p>“After removing patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis on a SNF claim, CMS found that the difference was 5.0 percent, attributing the 0.3 percent difference to increased spending to treat COVID-19 patients.” <br></p><p>In its study, Avalere conducted an analysis to evaluate the comprehensive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on SNF patients. Avalere used the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to analyze the percentage of patients with a respiratory diagnosis treated in SNFs in FY 2019 versus FY 2020. <br></p><p>Avalere’s analyses also examined changes in patient case-mix by month to determine how COVID-19 may have impacted payments for SNF care over the course of the pandemic. This month-by-month analysis also allows for an understanding of how government-mandated changes to patient management and SNF operations may have affected Medicare payments for SNF care for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 SNF patients.<br></p><p>From this examination, Avalere found that March 2020 marked the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the larger impact on the health care system, Avalere’s analysis of MDS assessment items for respiratory diagnoses (MDS Items I6200 and I6300) found a higher proportion of patients with respiratory diagnoses throughout FY 2020 relative to FY 2018 and FY 2019.<br></p><p>Guidance from CMS on COVID-19 diagnosis coding was not available to SNFs until March 2020, but researchers said respiratory diagnoses in SNFs were significantly higher in all of FY 2020 compared to prior years.<br></p><p>“While several factors may contribute to the higher rates of respiratory illness, it is conceivable that this sharp increase was driven in part by COVID-19 cases before CMS instituted a formal COVID-19 diagnosis code and by undiagnosed cases throughout the year,” the report said.<br></p><p>This finding suggests that CMS’ claims-based approach using the COVID-19 diagnosis code may not have adequately captured the COVID-19 case volumes over the course of the pandemic, Avalere said.<br></p><p>In addition to looking at the respiratory diagnosis items on MDS, Avalere also examined the ICD-10 diagnosis coding on MDS assessments and found that 10.3 percent of patients treated in SNFs had a diagnosis for COVID-19 over the course of FY 2020, with the highest number of cases occurring in April and May 2020.<br></p><p>Read the full report at <a href="https://avalere.com/insights/covid-19-pandemics-considerable-impact-on-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">COVID-19 Pandemic’s Considerable Impact on Skilled Nursing Facilities \| Avalere Health</a>.<br></p>	2021-06-16T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/staff_laptop_2.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	COVID-19	Patrick Connole	While designed to be budget neutral, more time and data are needed to evaluate how PDPM has been impacted by the pandemic.
Bipartisan Group of Senators Reintroduces Observation Stay Legislation	<p>Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Va.) have reintroduced their bipartisan legislation to update a current loophole in Medicare policy that would help protect seniors from high medical costs for the skilled nursing care they require after hospitalization.</p><p>The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act would allow for the time patients spend in the hospital under “observation status” to count toward the requisite three-day hospital stay for coverage of skilled nursing care. Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.) is the lead sponsor of bipartisan companion legislation in the House of Representatives. The other House sponsors are Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), Ron Estes (R-Kansas), and Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.).</p><p>Under the current Medicare policy, a beneficiary must have an “inpatient” hospital stay of at least three days in order for Medicare to cover post-hospitalization skilled nursing care. Patients that receive hospital care under “observation status” do not qualify for this benefit, even if their hospital stay lasts longer than three days, according to the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), a supporter of the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act.</p><p>“Seniors should be able to focus on their recovery instead of billing technicalities and sky-high medical bills, or, worse yet, trying to recover without the medical care they need because they can’t afford it,” said Brown. “This legislation would improve access to the medical care seniors need and saves money on hospital readmission costs. It’s a simple fix and the least we can do to protect our seniors from outrageous medical costs that they have no control over.”</p><p>Collins said when seniors require hospitalization, their focus should be on their health and recovery, not on how they were admitted.<br>“The financial consequences of this distinction between an observation stay and inpatient admittance can be severe for seniors,” she said. “Our bipartisan bill would help insulate older Americans from undue out-of-pocket costs and ensure that they get the care that they need.”</p><p>Whitehouse added that seniors trying to recover shouldn’t have to worry about accessing the skilled nursing care they need. This bipartisan legislation would fix a quirk in the billing rules that forces patients into stressful and pointless long stays in the hospital, he said.</p><p>“West Virginia’s seniors shouldn’t have to pay more for their health care because of a technical loophole in our current Medicare law,” Capito said. “The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act is a commonsense bill to right this wrong and protect seniors while they’re recovering in the hospital and at their most vulnerable. This bipartisan effort would take a crucial step forward in improving access to care for our seniors.”</p><p> AHCA/NCAL said the nursing care profession backs the legislative effort in the Senate. “Our nation’s skilled nursing facilities are privileged to help America’s seniors receive the therapy and care they need after a hospital stay, but Medicare’s three-day hospital stay requirement is arbitrary and unfair,” said AHCA/NCAL President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Parkinson.</p><p>“Too many seniors are left to foot the bill for their post-acute care, all because their hospital stay was coded as under observation. They deserve the chance to recover without worrying about how they’re going to pay for it. We greatly appreciate Sens. Brown, Capito, Collins, and Whitehouse for leading this charge once again, and we urge Congress to swiftly pass this legislation,” he said. </p><p>Specifically, the bill would:</p><p>• Amend Medicare law to count a beneficiary’s time spent in the hospital on “observation status” toward the three-day hospital stay requirement for skilled nursing care; and</p><p>• Establish a 90-day appeal period following passage for those that have a qualifying hospital stay and have been denied skilled nursing care after Jan. 1, 2021.</p><p>The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act has been <a href="https://www.brown.senate.gov/download/reintroduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-protect-seniors-high-costs-medical">endorsed by more than 30 organizations, </a>including: AARP, Alliance for Retired Americans, American Case Management Association, American Health Care Association, AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, Center for Medicare Advocacy, LeadingAge, National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, National Association of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs, National Center for Assisted Living, National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, and the Society of Hospital Medicine. </p>	2021-06-15T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/capitol_moon_night.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy	Patrick Connole	The law would count time spent in the hospital on “observation status” toward the three-day stay requirement for skilled nursing care under Medicare.
HHS Extends Deadlines for Provider Relief Fund Recipients	<p>In a move welcomed by the long term care profession, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on June 11 <a href="https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/provider-post-payment-notice-of-reporting-requirements-june-2021.pdf?cm_ven=ExactTarget&cm_cat=COVID-19+Update+%23182+Clif&cm_pla=All+Subscribers&cm_ite=released&cm_lm=pconnole%40ahca.org&cm_ainfo=&&&&&">released </a>updated reporting requirements for recipients of Provider Relief Fund (PRF) payments.</p><p>According to a summary by the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), with this announcement, HHS expands the amount of time providers will have to report information, aims to reduce burdens on smaller providers, and extends key deadlines for expending PRF payments for recipients who received payments after June 30, 2020. </p><p>Some key updates include:</p><p>• The period of availability of funds is based on the date the payment is received (rather than requiring all payments be used by June 30, 2021, regardless of when they were received).</p><p>• Recipients are required to report for each Payment Received Period in which they received one or more payments exceeding, in the aggregate, $10,000 (rather than $10,000 cumulatively across all PRF payments).</p><p>• Recipients will have a 90-day period to complete reporting (rather than a 30-day reporting period).</p><p>• The PRF Reporting Portal will open for providers to start submitting information on July 1, 2021.<br>Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of AHCA/NCAL, said, “The extensions by HHS regarding the use and reporting of aid received through the Provider Relief Fund is welcome news to the long term care profession.”</p><p>He added that “we greatly appreciate the administration recognizing that our battle with COVID-19 is not over yet, and that our ongoing efforts require ongoing resources. We now strongly encourage the agency to distribute the remaining funds and to dedicate a significant portion to long term care, which has been the epicenter of the pandemic and now faces imminent closures without additional aid.”</p><p></p>	2021-06-11T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0520_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy;COVID-19	Patrick Connole	The updated reporting requirements aim to reduce burdens on smaller providers.
New Study Examines Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Flu Vaccinations	<p>A new study in the June issue of JAMDA examines racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination among adults in nursing homes and what may factor into the statistical differences among these groups.</p><p>In “Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Influenza Vaccination,” authors analyzed data for 630,373 short-stay and 1,029,593 long-stay nursing home residents. The researchers found that among short-stay residents, the proportion vaccinated against influenza was 67.2 percent for White residents, 55.1 percent for Black residents, and 54.5 percent for Hispanic residents.</p><p>The numbers were higher for long-stay residents, at 84.2 percent for White individuals, 76.7 percent for Black, and 80.8 percent for Hispanic.</p><p>Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of influenza vaccination among short-stay residents included payer source, higher acuity index, percent of residents on an antipsychotic, and certified nurse assistant (CNA) hours per resident, the report said. </p><p>The authors noted that low vaccination rates may affect all individuals if ambulatory short-stay residents are able to move freely around the facility, potentially exposing others to respiratory illness.</p><p>In conclusion, the findings show that “measures associated with nursing home quality of care were important positive contributors to the disparity in influenza vaccination. Tracking vaccination rates in nursing homes to detect and intervene locally upon racial/ethnic differences may mitigate disparities until more detailed qualitative data is available to inform improvements to health care policy.”</p><p>The study was conducted by researchers at a number of domestic and international universities, including the Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, and the Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, in Canada.</p><p><a href="https://www.jamda.com/article/S1525-8610%2821%2900299-1/fulltext">Click here </a>for more information about the study.<br></p>	2021-06-11T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0220_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Caregiving	Patrick Connole	Rates are higher across the board for long-stay residents vs. short-stay patients.

All News

Evaluating PDPM Clouded by Changes Resulting from COVID-19 Pandemic	<p>A new report by Avalere Health examining the impact of the changes resulting from the transition to the Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) said more time and data are needed before any conclusions can be made on the impact of the new payment system due to the COVID-19 pandemic.<br></p><p>“The roll-out of the PDPM in October 2019 followed quickly by the COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges to understanding the extent to which increases in payment to skilled nursing facilities [SNFs] are due to the changes in the payment system versus changes in the patient populations served during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Avalere’s report said.<br></p><p>“Given the confounding effects of the pandemic and the new payment system, it is important to collect more data before evaluating the transition to the PDPM.”<br></p><p>The study comes at a time federal regulators are considering possible adjustments to the PDPM budget neutrality factor, which the report said are likely skewed by the impact of the pandemic on nursing home population shifts. A proposed adjustment from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would reduce PDPM payments to SNFs. <br></p><p>In reaction to the report, Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), said, “Without sufficient data prior to COVID-19, now is not the time to introduce another change to PDPM. Nursing home providers need reimbursement stability so they can remain focused on resident safety and quality care as they attempt to recover from the pandemic.”   <br></p><p>As background, Avalere noted that Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 was the first year of the new PDPM that CMS developed for SNFs. CMS designed PDPM to be budget neutral relative to payments under the previous Resource Utilization Groups Version IV (RUG-IV) payment system, report authors said. <br></p><p>“To maintain budget neutrality, any observed increases in payment under PDPM in FY 2020 are subject to a downward adjustment in future rates. In its assessment of budget neutrality, CMS estimated FY 2020 RUG-IV payments to be 5.3 percent higher than FY 2020 PDPM payments,” the report said. <br></p><p>“After removing patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis on a SNF claim, CMS found that the difference was 5.0 percent, attributing the 0.3 percent difference to increased spending to treat COVID-19 patients.” <br></p><p>In its study, Avalere conducted an analysis to evaluate the comprehensive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on SNF patients. Avalere used the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to analyze the percentage of patients with a respiratory diagnosis treated in SNFs in FY 2019 versus FY 2020. <br></p><p>Avalere’s analyses also examined changes in patient case-mix by month to determine how COVID-19 may have impacted payments for SNF care over the course of the pandemic. This month-by-month analysis also allows for an understanding of how government-mandated changes to patient management and SNF operations may have affected Medicare payments for SNF care for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 SNF patients.<br></p><p>From this examination, Avalere found that March 2020 marked the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the larger impact on the health care system, Avalere’s analysis of MDS assessment items for respiratory diagnoses (MDS Items I6200 and I6300) found a higher proportion of patients with respiratory diagnoses throughout FY 2020 relative to FY 2018 and FY 2019.<br></p><p>Guidance from CMS on COVID-19 diagnosis coding was not available to SNFs until March 2020, but researchers said respiratory diagnoses in SNFs were significantly higher in all of FY 2020 compared to prior years.<br></p><p>“While several factors may contribute to the higher rates of respiratory illness, it is conceivable that this sharp increase was driven in part by COVID-19 cases before CMS instituted a formal COVID-19 diagnosis code and by undiagnosed cases throughout the year,” the report said.<br></p><p>This finding suggests that CMS’ claims-based approach using the COVID-19 diagnosis code may not have adequately captured the COVID-19 case volumes over the course of the pandemic, Avalere said.<br></p><p>In addition to looking at the respiratory diagnosis items on MDS, Avalere also examined the ICD-10 diagnosis coding on MDS assessments and found that 10.3 percent of patients treated in SNFs had a diagnosis for COVID-19 over the course of FY 2020, with the highest number of cases occurring in April and May 2020.<br></p><p>Read the full report at <a href="https://avalere.com/insights/covid-19-pandemics-considerable-impact-on-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">COVID-19 Pandemic’s Considerable Impact on Skilled Nursing Facilities \| Avalere Health</a>.<br></p>	2021-06-16T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/staff_laptop_2.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	COVID-19	While designed to be budget neutral, more time and data are needed to evaluate how PDPM has been impacted by the pandemic.
Bipartisan Group of Senators Reintroduces Observation Stay Legislation	<p>Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Va.) have reintroduced their bipartisan legislation to update a current loophole in Medicare policy that would help protect seniors from high medical costs for the skilled nursing care they require after hospitalization.</p><p>The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act would allow for the time patients spend in the hospital under “observation status” to count toward the requisite three-day hospital stay for coverage of skilled nursing care. Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.) is the lead sponsor of bipartisan companion legislation in the House of Representatives. The other House sponsors are Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), Ron Estes (R-Kansas), and Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.).</p><p>Under the current Medicare policy, a beneficiary must have an “inpatient” hospital stay of at least three days in order for Medicare to cover post-hospitalization skilled nursing care. Patients that receive hospital care under “observation status” do not qualify for this benefit, even if their hospital stay lasts longer than three days, according to the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), a supporter of the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act.</p><p>“Seniors should be able to focus on their recovery instead of billing technicalities and sky-high medical bills, or, worse yet, trying to recover without the medical care they need because they can’t afford it,” said Brown. “This legislation would improve access to the medical care seniors need and saves money on hospital readmission costs. It’s a simple fix and the least we can do to protect our seniors from outrageous medical costs that they have no control over.”</p><p>Collins said when seniors require hospitalization, their focus should be on their health and recovery, not on how they were admitted.<br>“The financial consequences of this distinction between an observation stay and inpatient admittance can be severe for seniors,” she said. “Our bipartisan bill would help insulate older Americans from undue out-of-pocket costs and ensure that they get the care that they need.”</p><p>Whitehouse added that seniors trying to recover shouldn’t have to worry about accessing the skilled nursing care they need. This bipartisan legislation would fix a quirk in the billing rules that forces patients into stressful and pointless long stays in the hospital, he said.</p><p>“West Virginia’s seniors shouldn’t have to pay more for their health care because of a technical loophole in our current Medicare law,” Capito said. “The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act is a commonsense bill to right this wrong and protect seniors while they’re recovering in the hospital and at their most vulnerable. This bipartisan effort would take a crucial step forward in improving access to care for our seniors.”</p><p> AHCA/NCAL said the nursing care profession backs the legislative effort in the Senate. “Our nation’s skilled nursing facilities are privileged to help America’s seniors receive the therapy and care they need after a hospital stay, but Medicare’s three-day hospital stay requirement is arbitrary and unfair,” said AHCA/NCAL President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Parkinson.</p><p>“Too many seniors are left to foot the bill for their post-acute care, all because their hospital stay was coded as under observation. They deserve the chance to recover without worrying about how they’re going to pay for it. We greatly appreciate Sens. Brown, Capito, Collins, and Whitehouse for leading this charge once again, and we urge Congress to swiftly pass this legislation,” he said. </p><p>Specifically, the bill would:</p><p>• Amend Medicare law to count a beneficiary’s time spent in the hospital on “observation status” toward the three-day hospital stay requirement for skilled nursing care; and</p><p>• Establish a 90-day appeal period following passage for those that have a qualifying hospital stay and have been denied skilled nursing care after Jan. 1, 2021.</p><p>The Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act has been <a href="https://www.brown.senate.gov/download/reintroduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-protect-seniors-high-costs-medical">endorsed by more than 30 organizations, </a>including: AARP, Alliance for Retired Americans, American Case Management Association, American Health Care Association, AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, Center for Medicare Advocacy, LeadingAge, National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, National Association of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs, National Center for Assisted Living, National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare, National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, and the Society of Hospital Medicine. </p>	2021-06-15T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/capitol_moon_night.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy	The law would count time spent in the hospital on “observation status” toward the three-day stay requirement for skilled nursing care under Medicare.
HHS Extends Deadlines for Provider Relief Fund Recipients	<p>In a move welcomed by the long term care profession, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on June 11 <a href="https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/provider-post-payment-notice-of-reporting-requirements-june-2021.pdf?cm_ven=ExactTarget&cm_cat=COVID-19+Update+%23182+Clif&cm_pla=All+Subscribers&cm_ite=released&cm_lm=pconnole%40ahca.org&cm_ainfo=&&&&&">released </a>updated reporting requirements for recipients of Provider Relief Fund (PRF) payments.</p><p>According to a summary by the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), with this announcement, HHS expands the amount of time providers will have to report information, aims to reduce burdens on smaller providers, and extends key deadlines for expending PRF payments for recipients who received payments after June 30, 2020. </p><p>Some key updates include:</p><p>• The period of availability of funds is based on the date the payment is received (rather than requiring all payments be used by June 30, 2021, regardless of when they were received).</p><p>• Recipients are required to report for each Payment Received Period in which they received one or more payments exceeding, in the aggregate, $10,000 (rather than $10,000 cumulatively across all PRF payments).</p><p>• Recipients will have a 90-day period to complete reporting (rather than a 30-day reporting period).</p><p>• The PRF Reporting Portal will open for providers to start submitting information on July 1, 2021.<br>Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of AHCA/NCAL, said, “The extensions by HHS regarding the use and reporting of aid received through the Provider Relief Fund is welcome news to the long term care profession.”</p><p>He added that “we greatly appreciate the administration recognizing that our battle with COVID-19 is not over yet, and that our ongoing efforts require ongoing resources. We now strongly encourage the agency to distribute the remaining funds and to dedicate a significant portion to long term care, which has been the epicenter of the pandemic and now faces imminent closures without additional aid.”</p><p></p>	2021-06-11T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0520_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy;COVID-19	The updated reporting requirements aim to reduce burdens on smaller providers.
New Study Examines Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Flu Vaccinations	<p>A new study in the June issue of JAMDA examines racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination among adults in nursing homes and what may factor into the statistical differences among these groups.</p><p>In “Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Influenza Vaccination,” authors analyzed data for 630,373 short-stay and 1,029,593 long-stay nursing home residents. The researchers found that among short-stay residents, the proportion vaccinated against influenza was 67.2 percent for White residents, 55.1 percent for Black residents, and 54.5 percent for Hispanic residents.</p><p>The numbers were higher for long-stay residents, at 84.2 percent for White individuals, 76.7 percent for Black, and 80.8 percent for Hispanic.</p><p>Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of influenza vaccination among short-stay residents included payer source, higher acuity index, percent of residents on an antipsychotic, and certified nurse assistant (CNA) hours per resident, the report said. </p><p>The authors noted that low vaccination rates may affect all individuals if ambulatory short-stay residents are able to move freely around the facility, potentially exposing others to respiratory illness.</p><p>In conclusion, the findings show that “measures associated with nursing home quality of care were important positive contributors to the disparity in influenza vaccination. Tracking vaccination rates in nursing homes to detect and intervene locally upon racial/ethnic differences may mitigate disparities until more detailed qualitative data is available to inform improvements to health care policy.”</p><p>The study was conducted by researchers at a number of domestic and international universities, including the Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, and the Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, in Canada.</p><p><a href="https://www.jamda.com/article/S1525-8610%2821%2900299-1/fulltext">Click here </a>for more information about the study.<br></p>	2021-06-11T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0220_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Caregiving	Rates are higher across the board for long-stay residents vs. short-stay patients.
Majority of Senior Housing Properties Avoided COVID-19 Deaths	<p>A new report said 51 percent of senior housing properties experienced no COVID-19 deaths in 2020, according to an <a href="https://info.nic.org/covid-19-mortality-in-congregate-care">analysis </a>by NORC at the University of Chicago with a grant provided by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care (NIC).</p><p>Researchers analyzed data for four facility types in more than 100 counties across five states.</p><p>What they found was that two-thirds (67 percent) of independent living properties, 64 percent of assisted living properties, and 61 percent of memory care properties studied experienced no COVID-19-related deaths. Thirty-nine percent of skilled nursing facilities saw no COVID-19-related deaths during the same period.</p><p>“While COVID-19 has been devastating for older adults, a majority of properties avoided any resident deaths,” said Caroline Pearson, senior vice president of health care strategy and lead researcher at NORC.</p><p>“Death rates in senior housing increased in settings of care that serve the most vulnerable residents, based on age, health status, and caregiving needs. Healthier, more active residents in independent living had comparable mortality to those living in private homes.”</p><p>The analysis found COVID-19 deaths across senior housing properties rose in conjunction with the acuity, or severity, of the illness of the average resident and the complexity of caregiving needed. The highest mortality by percentage occurred in memory care and skilled nursing facilities. </p><p>In contrast, the average mortality rate for adults in independent living properties was statistically the same as the mortality rate of the age 75 and over population in corresponding counties, suggesting residents in this type of group setting were not at higher risk of death from COVID-19 than those living in private homes.</p><p>“Ultimately every COVID death in any community designed for older adults is tragic, and lessons were learned regarding health and safety protocols and where improvements are most needed,” said Brian Jurutka, NIC president and chief executive officer. </p><p>“The facts include that COVID-19 transmission is more likely with close person-to-person contact, and mortality increases with age and comorbidities. This study shows senior housing isn’t homogeneous, and mortality was higher in property types whose residents, on average, are sicker and require higher levels of care.”</p><p>Experts say COVID-19 may have accelerated or replaced other common causes of death in 2020. However, data show that residents in senior housing properties are older and more vulnerable than people who live in private homes. Prior to COVID-19, almost one-third of all nursing home residents died annually, with skilled nursing facilities often being the final residence prior to death.</p><p>“These findings are critical to informing the public’s understanding of safety within various senior housing options,” said Terry Fulmer, president of The John A. Hartford Foundation. “As older adults consider their living arrangements, this information can empower informed decisions.”</p><p>The analysis included data from 3,817 senior housing properties across 113 counties in five states: Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. A complete report and data methodology are available <a href="https://info.nic.org/covid-19-mortality-in-congregate-care">here.</a></p>	2021-06-07T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0620_News2.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	COVID-19	Death rates increased in care settings that serve the most vulnerable residents, based on age, health status, and caregiving needs.
AHCA, NCAL Seek Extension to Deadline on Provider Relief Fund Reporting	<p>The American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL) continues to seek an extension to the June 30 deadline for providers to report on how COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) monies were spent and/or return unused funds.</p><p>The PRF, established by the CARES Act, has been an instrumental resource for health care providers amid the pandemic, the association said. Long term care facilities have received approximately $14 billion of the $178 billion in the PRF since the pandemic began, which has helped providers with the costs associated with combating the virus. </p><p>Personal protective equipment (PPE), testing, hiring additional workers, and providing hero pay are just a few things the aid has helped pay for, AHCA/NCAL said. For many providers, the funding was the difference between keeping their doors open or closing them for good, the association added. </p><p>In April, the organization sent a <a href="https://www.ahcancal.org/News-and-Communications/Fact-Sheets/Letters/HHS-Letter-PRF.pdf">letter </a>to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra, requesting that the reporting deadline be extended to Dec. 30, 2022. In the letter, AHCA/NCAL said the extension is needed because: </p><p>• Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and assisted living communities (ALCs) will experience ongoing higher operating costs while occupancy remains at record lows. The industry is expected to lose $94 billion over a two-year period (2020-2021) due to the skyrocketing costs to fight the pandemic. In 2020, nursing homes spent roughly $30 billion on PPE and additional staffing alone. Many SNF and ALC providers faced financial struggles even before the pandemic, but the situation is becoming more dire, with the industry anticipating record closures.</p><p>• Declining occupancy has compounded financial challenges. SNF occupancy declined by 16.5 percent between January 2020 and January 2021. Occupancy rates for ALCs dropped to a record-low 77.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2020. AHCA/NCAL said its research estimates that more than 1,600 SNFs could close in 2021. A recent AHCA/NCAL member survey said 56 percent of ALCs would not be able to maintain operations at current levels an additional 12 months without additional revenue or financial relief.</p><p>And, the group said it is not alone in requesting an extension. Reps. Cindy Axne (D-Iowa) and Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa) also sent a <a href="https://axne.house.gov/sites/axne.house.gov/files/Axne%20and%20Miller-Meeks%20PRF%20Deadline%20Letter%20to%20HHS.pdf">letter </a>to Becerra—co-signed by nearly 80 Republican and Democrat members—asking that the June 30 deadline be extended, and that remaining PRF funding be distributed as soon as possible. The American Hospital Association <a href="https://www.aha.org/lettercomment/2021-05-10-letter-americas-hospitals-and-health-systems-urging-hhs-extend-deadline">requested </a>that the deadline be extended until the end of the public health emergency as well. </p><p>Restaurants, which also experienced significant hardships over the course of the pandemic, have until 2023 to use COVID-relief funding. AHCA/NCAL said it hopes that HHS takes the same approach with the PRF for health care providers.   </p><p>“Federal lawmakers rallied around long term care facilities and gave them some of the critical assistance they needed, but they still need support,” AHCA/NCAL said. “COVID-related expenditures will remain constant for the foreseeable future. Extending the reporting deadline will help long term care providers maintain operations and continue to protect our most vulnerable citizens and frontline health care heroes.”<br></p>	2021-06-03T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0520_news4.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy;COVID-19	Declining occupancy has compounded financial challenges, and more than 1,600 SNFs could close in 2021.
AHCA, NCAL Back New Legislation to Address Three-day Stay Rule	<p>The American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL) on June 1 offered praise for the introduction of the Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act, HR 3650, which would count observation stays in the hospital toward meeting the three-day hospital stay rule.</p><p>Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of AHCA/NCAL, said the long term and post-acute care profession applauds Reps. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), Ron Estes (R-Kansas), and Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) for introducing “this important, bipartisan legislation today.”</p><p>“The three-day hospital stay rule causes too many seniors who need follow-up care in a skilled nursing facility to be shackled with out-of-pocket costs in the thousands because they do not qualify for Medicare coverage. For years we have advocated to eliminate this confusing and devastating policy barrier,” he said.</p><p>Parkinson said the waiver of the requirement during the COVID-19 pandemic public health emergency has benefitted thousands of Medicare beneficiaries and demonstrated that eliminating this policy can work. </p><p>“Now it is time this issue was fixed permanently. We greatly appreciate that this legislation will count observation stays toward the three-day stay requirement, ultimately helping our patients receive the quality care they deserve without worrying about how they’re going to pay for it.”<br></p>	2021-06-01T04:00:00Z	<img alt="" src="/Breaking-News/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0420_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" />	Policy	The act would count observation stays in the hospital toward meeting the hospital stay rule.