Print Friendly  |  
  • LinkedIn
  • Add to Favorites


 Rockefeller Tells HHS To Go Back To Drawing Board On Dual Eligibles

The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS’) latest efforts to provide care for the poorest of the poor are highly flawed, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) told Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in a public letter.

The Coordinated Care Office has promulgated what HHS is calling a Financial Alignment Initiative to care for those patients who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. But the care model is hopelessly flawed because it focuses on cutting costs, not on delivering quality care, because it doesn’t test new ideas “rigorously” and doesn’t “guarantee” that dual eligibles can get the same care as Medicare-only patients, Rockefeller said in the letter, dated Monday.

“While I strongly support the Coordinated Care Office’s mission, I am very concerned that the capitated model under the Financial Alignment Initiative, as currently structured, runs counter to both the letter and the spirit of the [Affordable Care Act] …” Rockefeller said.

He urged Sebelius to “take immediate steps to halt this initiative” and “to take the time necessary to develop a well-designed and thoroughly evaluated care coordination model for dual eligibles that meets the standards outlined in the law.”

On the question of cost over care, Rockefeller said that the “most important goal … is to improve the quality of care for each of the different subpopulations of dual eligibles—whether or not such approaches save money.”

The senator said that the current focus “will create an enormous amount of pressure on managed care companies … to take shortcuts in order to achieve savings”—a “particular concern given that some states are proposing to enroll dual eligibles in plans that have not demonstrated their ability to deliver high-quality care for this population.”

Rockefeller is also worried that some states will simply enroll their dual eligibles into the Financial Alignment Initiative without “rigorously” testing new ideas. “Demonstration programs should not start out with a design and scale that arbitrarily assumes the success and universal applicability of the concepts they are intended to test,” Rockefeller wrote. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services “should also test a model that brings care for dual eligibles under the federal umbrella,” he added.

Finally, HHS must “guarantee that dual eligibles retain all the rights and the same access to care” as all other Medicare patients, Rockefeller said. It “is becoming increasingly clear” as details of state models leak out, “that the rights and choices of Medicare beneficiaries … could be diluted,” he wrote.

Rockefeller wants a reply from Sebelius by July 20, the letter said.

COMMENTS (2)
Judy Berry
8:40 PM
July 12, 2012
I Also commend Senator Rockefeller for challenging the focus of this part of the ACA. I am the founder of the Lakeview Ranch Model of Specialized Dementia Care which was developed, over the last 13 years, with a focus on creating the highest Quality of Life possible for the population of seniors with dementia and a history of repeated hospitalizations and discharges from understaffed facilities for what is labeled challenging/aggressive behavior. Reaserch on this model has shown a successful 93.3% reduction in behavior hospitalizations and unnecessary tests and treatments saving millions just in hospitalizations and inappropriate psychotropic drug use alone to say nothing of significant reduction in burden of care for the senior with dementia, their filies and the overall healthcare & economic system. This mission of this model has always been to find the way to provide Appropriate high quality care for this high risk & high cost population that allows them to maintain their basic human rights to dignity, choice and the highest quality of life possible and also provide this care "EQUALLY" to the population of low income population of seniors on Medicaid!! The Dilema is that when we provide higher quality care that delivers overall better health, eliminates challenging behavior by meeting the emotional need causing behavior, Medicaid reimbursement rates are CUT Significantly!! Only large providers, nursing homes, and hospitals are eligible for any supplimental P4P funding. Reimbursement MUST be changed to pay based on performance on measurable positive outcomes in both quality of life and reduction in costs. Although my work with this has earned a 2010 RWJF Community Health Leaders Award and is highlighted on the AHRQ healthcare innovations website in 2011, It is frustrating that because this model is available only at this time in Rural MN, but could easily be replicable in other environments, no one is willing to take a serious look at providing pilot outcome based incentive funding to ensure equal access for seniors on Medicaid. Now we supplement the Medicaid gap through scholarship funding from the Dementia Care Foundation which has awarded over $ 1 million dollars to help low income seniors access this necessary care! I would like to get introductions to the people that are looking at this and are committed to the mission of Better Care, Better Health, better quality of life AND significantly lower healthcare costs. We have been doing this for more than 13 years!!
Rob Zitsman
4:31 PM
July 12, 2012
I commend Senator Rockefeller on this excellent and most timely letter. He clearly understands what is at stake for health and wellness of Medicare benificiaries who also rely on Medicaid.
The statement you are about to submit, and we have the right to review, will be viewable publically, as discussed in our website Terms and Conditions
Facebook.png   Twitter  Linked-In
Sign In