AHCA/NCAL Elects Boards for 2020-2021 Term; Meade and Crunk Remain Chairs | https://www.providermagazine.com/Articles/Pages/AHCA-NCAL-Elects-Boards-for-2020-2021-Term;-Meade-and-Crunk-Remain-Chairs.aspx | AHCA/NCAL Elects Boards for 2020-2021 Term; Meade and Crunk Remain Chairs | <p>The American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL) have elected AHCA’s Board of Governors and NCAL’s Board of Directors for the 2020/2021 term, confirming Debbie Meade of Georgia’s re-election as AHCA chair and Helen Crunk of Nebraska’s re-election as NCAL chair. <br></p><p>“I am proud to work alongside these extraordinary titans in our sector,” said Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer (CEO) of AHCA/NCAL. <br></p><p>“This has been our most challenging year, and their leadership is critical as they guide us through this unprecedented time.”<br></p><p>New AHCA Board members include Randy Bury, CEO of the Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society; Sarah Schumann, vice president of operations at Brookside Inn; and Heath Boddy, president and CEO of the Nebraska Health Care Association and president of the Affiliated State Health Care Association Executives (ASHCAE).<br>Members of AHCA’s 2020-2021 Board include: <br></p><ul><li><img src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/1120DebbieMeade.jpg" alt="Debbie Meade" class="ms-rtePosition-2" style="margin:5px;width:230px;height:230px;" />Debbie Meade of Health Management (Georgia), AHCA Chair</li><li>Phil Fogg of Marquis Companies (Oregon), AHCA Vice Chair</li><li>Phil Scalo of Bartley Healthcare (New Jersey), Secretary/Treasurer</li><li>J. Mark Traylor of Traylor Porter Healthcare (Alabama), Independent Owner Representative</li><li>Steve Flatt of National Healthcare Corp. (Tennessee), Multifacility Representative</li><li>Randy Bury of The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (South Dakota), Not for Profit Representative</li><li>Derek Prince of HMG Healthcare (Texas), At-large Representative</li><li>Joe Mitchell of Summit Care (Florida), At-large Representative</li><li>Sarah Schumann of Brookside Inn (Colorado), At-large Representative</li><li>Julianne Williams of Dycora Transitional Health (California), At-large Representative</li><li>Chris Wright of iCare Health Network (Connecticut), At-large Representative</li><li>Helen Crunk of Pemberly Place Management & Archer Place Medical Clinic (Nebraska), NCAL Representative</li><li>Heath Boddy of Nebraska Health Care Association (Nebraska), ASHCAE Representative</li><li>Betsy Rust of Plante Moran (Michigan), Associate Business Member (ABM) Representative; and</li><li>Michael Wylie of Genesis HealthCare (Pennsylvania), Immediate Past Chair.</li></ul><p>The NCAL Board of Directors welcomed newcomers Todd Dockerty, CEO of Dockerty Health Care Services; Stacy Hejda, vice president of regulatory compliance at Assisted Living Partners; and ASHCAE Vice President Jesse Samples of the Tennessee Health Care Association.</p><p dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;"><img src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/1120HelenCrunk.jpg" alt="Helen Crunk" class="ms-rtePosition-2" style="margin:5px 20px;width:230px;height:230px;" />The members of NCAL’s 2020-2021 Board of Directors include: </p><ul><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Helen Crunk of Pemberly Place (Nebraska), Chair</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Gerald Hamilton of BeeHive Homes of Albuquerque (New Mexico), Vice Chair</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Mark Maxfield of The Cottages (Idaho), Secretary/Treasurer</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Patricia Giorgio of Evergreen Estates (Iowa), Immediate Past Chair</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">John Bolduc of Odd Fellows’ and Rebekahs’ Home of Maine (Maine), At-large Representative</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Rod Burkett of Gardant Management Solutions (Illinois), At-large Representative</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Megan Campbell of IntegraCare Corp. (Pennsylvania), At-large Representative</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Sue Coppola of Sunrise Senior Living (Virginia), At-large Representative</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Ana de la Cerda of Aegis Living (Washington), At-large Representative</li><li dir="ltr" style="text-align:left;">Todd Dockerty of Dockerty Health Care Services (Michigan), At-large Representative</li><li>Darryl Fisher of Mission Senior Living (Nevada), At-large Representative</li><li>Denise German of Medicalodges (Kansas), At-large Representative</li><li>Stacy Hejda of Assisted Living Partners (Iowa), At-large Representative</li><li>Barbara Mitchell of Magnolia Manor (Georgia), At-large Representative</li><li>Sean Mockbee of Sunshine Village (Arizona), At-large Representative</li><li>Gail Sheridan of Tealwood Care Centers (Minnesota), At-large Representative</li><li>Sarah Silva of Avamere Health Services (Oregon), At-large Representative</li><li>Elizabeth Wheatley of Five Star Senior Living (Arizona), At-large Representative</li><li>Doug Farmer of Colorado Health Care Association (Colorado), State Affiliate Representative</li><li>David Voepel of Arizona Health Care Association (Arizona), State Affiliate Representative; and</li><li>Shawn Scott of Medline Industries (Illinois), ABM Representative.<br></li></ul><p>The ex-officio members on the NCAL Board of Directors include Meade as the AHCA chair and Fogg as the AHCA vice chair, as well as ASHCAE Vice President Jesse Samples.<br></p><p>“This year’s NCAL Board incorporates leaders from across the nation that will go above and beyond to help our assisted living members succeed,” said Scott Tittle, executive director of NCAL. <br></p><p>“Now more than ever, we need strong individuals to lead us in this fight against COVID-19, and this group is prepared to do just that.”<br></p><p>Members of the AHCA Board of Governors are elected by the association’s governing body, the Council of States. The NCAL Board of Directors is elected by current members of the NCAL Board and by NCAL State Leaders.<br></p> | AHCA/NCAL have elected AHCA’s Board of Governors and NCAL’s Board of Directors for the 2020/2021 term, confirming Debbie Meade of Georgia’s re-election as AHCA chair and Helen Crunk of Nebraska’s re-election as NCAL chair.
| 2020-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/1120DebbieMeade.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | |
Coalition Works to Avert Major Medicare Payment Cuts | https://www.providermagazine.com/Articles/Pages/Coalition-Works-to-Avert-Major-Medicare-Payment-Cuts.aspx | Coalition Works to Avert Major Medicare Payment Cuts | <p>An effort to protect Medicare payments to long term and post-acute care providers continues on Capitol Hill and in official Washington, according to a source with the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL), who says the Calendar Year (CY) 2021 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule is a top priority.<br></p><p>Daniel Ciolek, associate vice president for therapy advocacy at AHCA/NCAL, says the proposed rule has been out of mind for many providers due to the attention required for battling the COVID pandemic. If finalized, he says the rule could result in significant payment cuts in 2021 for Part B therapy and other cuts to skilled nursing facility (SNF) physicians and portable X-ray providers that may impact the service residents in SNFs may receive.<br></p><p>The proposed cuts could also negatively impact assisted living (AL) communities and access to care for residents with intellectual/developmental disabilities (ID/DD).<br></p><p>For more than a year, Ciolek says AHCA/NCAL has worked with a coalition of 47 provider organizations to head off the cuts with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In addition, the coalition has worked on the issue with Congress since part of the problem with the proposed rule is a result of statutory budget-neutrality restrictions.<br></p><p>“We recognize that part of the problem is that statutory budget neutrality limits placed on the Medicare Part B physician fee schedule payment methodology create a situation that CMS is forced to ‘rob Peter to pay Paul,’” he says.<br></p><p>By way of background, in the CY 2020 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule (84 FR 62568), CMS finalized broad changes related to physician evaluation and management (E/M) services to reduce administrative burden, improve payment rates, and reflect current clinical practice.<br></p><p>The health care community supported restructuring and revaluing the office-based E/M codes, which will increase payments for primary care and other office-based services. Unfortunately, by law, any changes to the PFS cannot increase or decrease expenditures by more than $20 million. To comply with this budget-neutrality requirement, any increases must, therefore, be offset by corresponding decreases, Ciolek says.<br></p><p>As reflected in Table 90 of the proposed rule, payments for common PFS services furnished to residents in SNF, AL, and ID/DD residences will be cut 9 percent for physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) services and 6 percent for portable X-ray services. In addition, the proposed rate tables for individual procedures indicate that speech language pathology (SLP) services as well as physician E/M services furnished to SNF residents will be cut up to 11 percent.<br></p><p>Speaking on the overall payment cut proposal, Ciolek says AHCA/NCAL realizes that in asking for the changes, CMS wants to improve the fairness of payments to physicians who manage patients with complex conditions in their offices.<br></p><p>“However, the solution, especially during a worldwide pandemic that most impacts patients in our AHCA/NCAL member facilities that are older and have multiple comorbidities, is not to cut payments to providers including physicians, portable X-ray providers, and therapists who furnish care to these individuals,” he says.<br></p><p>Ciolek adds that the association and coalition are hopeful that CMS will be responsive to the massive number of submitted comments from 42,640 provider and consumer stakeholders as well as members of Congress and put a pause on the planned payment cuts.<br></p><p>“While CMS may be able to offer some relief in the upcoming Final Rule, Congress will need to step up to the plate to fix this permanently,” he says.<br></p> | An effort to protect Medicare payments to long term and post-acute care providers continues on Capitol Hill and in official Washington. | 2020-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/1120_news1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | Capitol Hill |
COVID Only Halfway Over, Government Support Must Extend Into 2021, Parkinson Says | https://www.providermagazine.com/Articles/Pages/COVID-Only-Halfway-Over,-Government-Support-Must-Extend-Into-2021,-Parkinson-Says-.aspx | COVID Only Halfway Over, Government Support Must Extend Into 2021, Parkinson Says | <p>Long term and post-acute care providers are tired and drained from their continuing battle against the still-raging COVID-19 pandemic, says Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL).</p><p>The battle against the virus is a marathon, he says, and only around one-half over, with next spring being the most logical time a vaccine can start to bring relief for residents, families, and caregivers who have been on the frontlines since March.</p><p>In a wide-ranging talk with Provider, the longtime association leader presented a no-nonsense assessment of where skilled nursing, assisted living, and other settings of care for the nation’s elderly and people with disabilities stand heading into the final months of a year that has marked thousands of residents dying from a virus that keeps challenging facilities even as most take every precaution to keep it out.</p><p>“I think that the unfortunate reality of the pandemic has been to expose that older people are not held in the same priority as younger people,” he says. “Older people are not held with the esteem that they should be, and so political decisions were made that led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people.”</p><p>“I think that we are about halfway through, maybe a little over halfway. I am optimistic that there will be a vaccine by the end of the year and that we [long term care] will be prioritized. Even with that it will take a couple of months for our staff and residents to be fully vaccinated.”</p><p>Providers Make Progress, But Public Limits Success<br>Parkinson says the way in which providers have learned to keep the infection out of facilities, and if not able, to treat those infected, has improved dramatically since the crisis started in March.</p><p>“Providers have gotten really good at taking care of people with COVID. We started with absolutely no knowledge of how to treat this virus, and they quickly demonstrated that given the proper PPE [personal protective equipment], therapeutics, and resources that they can get most people well,” he says.<br>“There have been hundreds of thousands of recoveries of residents in our buildings, and the success rate is growing all the time.”</p><p>The problem, however, is not limited to what happens inside nursing homes and assisted living communities. “Unfortunately, the public has proved to be completely incapable of social distancing and of wearing masks, so the incidence of COVID in the general population has not declined, and in fact in some parts of the country it continues to increase, which puts enormous stress on long term care facilities and makes containing the virus very hard,” Parkinson says.</p><p>He adds that he does not think the public is suddenly going to get more disciplined, and, therefore, for the next five or six months providers will continue to fight COVID before there is a vaccine.</p><p>“It is going to be just as challenging as it has been for the last six or seven months,” Parkinson says.</p><h3>Fatigue Has Set in</h3><p>The association leader says it is important to realize that these next months will be even harder because of the fatigue factor, born from the long days and nights logged by all involved in the battle.</p><p>“Providers are tired. Whether you are a frontline CNA or a CEO, all these folks have worked basically nonstop for the last seven months. And, fatigue has set in, and for them to be able to continue this fight for the next six months as I think will be required is going to be very, very tough for them,” Parkinson says.</p><p>As head of AHCA/NCAL, he thinks the most important thing the organization has done for the past seven months is being very effective at getting provider members the resources that they need. “The government relations team led by Clif Porter has been really effective in convincing Congress and HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] that our members need support, and the support has been provided.”</p><p>Parkinson says when combining the federal support with the state aid that has been provided, “we are probably well over $20 billion in relief that has been provided so far.” But the assistance cannot stop now as he says the continued challenge for the next six months is to keep Congress and HHS focused on “that continual need that providers have.”</p><h3>Money Issues Hit All</h3><p>Every provider, he notes, has been negatively affected in that they have had significant COVID in their buildings or if not then because census is down across the board.</p><p>Providers that have been hit hard by COVID have been able to stay afloat from the federal and state assistance, but if there is not more help in 2021 some people will be in real financial trouble. “So far the funds have been adequate, but the challenge right now is to keep them going in 2021,” Parkinson says.</p><p>“If we had not had federal funding that we have received so far there would have been hundreds of buildings that were already closed. That funding kept those buildings open, and similarly we need that continued funding in 2021 or hundreds of buildings will close.”</p><p>Who makes many of the high-level decisions could be impacted by the election results that occur on Nov. 3. Normally, Parkinson says the election outcome affects the profession in a very dramatic way, but in 2020 with the pandemic there has been bipartisan support for taking care of older people and supporting long term care.</p><p>“Regardless of the outcome of the election, we are going to get a good response for continuing assistance. The changes may be bigger on the regulatory side, as some may look at what has happened at nursing homes and look to overregulate or penalize more. Others who get elected want to be more collaborative [with the long term care sector]. We are hopeful members who get elected to Congress want to be collaborative,” he says. </p><h3>When Will Census Recover?</h3><p>Providers are also hopeful for a return of normal business in order to recover census and fill beds with people who need long term and post-acute care. Parkinson says the “when will we recover” question is the most important one.</p><p>“Census in nursing homes dropped about 10 percent very quickly in April and May and seemed to bottom out on June 1. But it has not gotten any better,” he says.</p><p>“For the sector to truly recover financially, census has to recover. My view is that once we have a vaccine, people will renew their confidence in our care setting, and there will be a slow recovery of census. It will not snap back immediately; it will be more like half a percent or 1 percent a month for a year or two, and then census will recover.”</p><p>Parkinson says he does not believe “we will have a permanently lower census as a result of the pandemic. Our services are necessary for people. The people who live in our buildings are just not capable of living at home, so once we get their confidence back, our census will recover, but it will take a year or two.”<br></p><p></p> | The battle against the virus is a marathon, he says, with next spring being the most logical time a vaccine can start to bring relief for residents, families, and caregivers. | 2020-10-16T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/1120MarkParkinson.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | COVID-19 |
NIC Expert Says Occupancy Will Evolve as Owners, Operators Look for Recovery | https://www.providermagazine.com/Articles/Pages/NIC-Expert-Says-Occupancy-Will-Evolve-as-Owners,-Operators-Look-for-Recovery.aspx | NIC Expert Says Occupancy Will Evolve as Owners, Operators Look for Recovery | <p><em>Provider</em> posed a series of questions to Beth Burnham Mace, chief economist and director of outreach at the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care (NIC), on issues tied to the COVID-19 pandemic and occupancy levels across the seniors housing sector.<br><br class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><em class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><strong>Provider:</strong></em> What is the current trend for occupancy, and which of the market segments is showing the most negative impact from the pandemic?<strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3"><br></strong></p><p><strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3">Mace: </strong>The distinction between nursing care/skilled nursing and seniors housing is especially important to consider in discussing occupancy performance because the frailest elderly are often patients of skilled nursing’s higher acuity setting with around-the-clock nursing attention. And, it has been these elderly patients with significant pre-existing conditions that have seen the highest rates of COVID-19 incidence and fatalities. <br></p><p>Partially as a result, according to data from the NIC MAP® Data Service, the occupancy rate for skilled nursing properties fell more than other segment types with a 6.5 percentage point decline from the first quarter to 80.2 percent in the second quarter of 2020.<br></p><p>This was significantly more than the 2.8 percentage point drop in seniors housing properties to 84.9 percent, and when the aggregated seniors housing category is broken down into its subcategories, there was a 3.2 percentage point decline seen in assisted living properties to 82.1 percent and a 2.4 percentage point decline in independent living properties to 87.4 percent from the first to second quarters.<br><span><br class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><em class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><strong>Provider:</strong></em> </span> A big if, but if the pandemic is under control and vaccines available to all, what do you expect the occupancy outlook to be once this terrible time abates? <span><strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3"><br></strong></span></p><p><span><strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3">Mace: </strong></span> As you point out, the pandemic holds the cards. At this point, the outlook for the sector is tied to the path of the pandemic, its infection and penetration rate within properties, and the impact of the pandemic on broad economic growth. The seniors housing and nursing care industry as well as the broader national economy will be negatively affected by the COVID-19 virus until a vaccine is available and widely distributed. <br></p><p>And, whenever that happens, I do not believe that we will go back to business-as-usual. I believe that there is a transformational change in the seniors hosing and care industry and that the change will continue to evolve. Occupancy will eventually return to pre-pandemic levels, but the industry will be changed.<br><span><br class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><em class="ms-rteForeColor-1"><strong>Provider:</strong></em> </span> And, we have the demographics to consider?<span><strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3"><br></strong></span></p><p><span><strong class="ms-rteForeColor-3">Mace: </strong></span>: Yes, more broadly, the underlying fundamentals and drivers of seniors housing remain in place. First, the demographics alone support the growing need for care and housing for seniors. Today, there are seven adult children aged 45 to 64 to care for every senior over the age of 80. By 2030, this ratio shrinks to 4:1, and by 2050, it becomes 3:1. Fewer caregivers suggest that community-based congregate settings will be needed more than ever. <br></p><p>Second, with nearly two of every three properties built before 2000, the inventory of senior housing properties is relatively old, and often a property refresh is needed for design, functionality, and efficiency. And, as obsolescence increases, new supply is needed at least in some markets. <br></p> | Provider posed a series of questions to Beth Burnham Mace, chief economist and director of outreach at NIC, on issues tied to the COVID-19 pandemic and occupancy levels across the seniors housing sector. | 2020-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/housing_2.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | Management;COVID-19 |
Occupancy Will Evolve as Owners, Operators Look for Recovery, Says NIC Expert | https://www.providermagazine.com/Articles/Pages/Occupancy-Will-Evolve-as-Owners,-Operators-Look-for-Recovery,-Says-NIC-Expert.aspx | Occupancy Will Evolve as Owners, Operators Look for Recovery, Says NIC Expert | <p><em>Below is the first of a two-part interview. Keep your eyes out for the <a href="/Articles/Pages/Lessons-from-COVID-19-Experience-Will-Impact-Senior-Housing-for-Years.aspx">second part</a> coming to you next week in another Provider News Alert.</em></p><p><em>Provider </em>posed a series of questions to Beth Burnham Mace, chief economist and director of outreach at the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care (NIC), on issues tied to the COVID-19 pandemic and occupancy levels across the seniors housing sector.</p><p><em>Provider</em>: What is the current trend for occupancy, and which of the market segments is showing the most negative impact from the pandemic?</p><p>Mace: The distinction between nursing care/skilled nursing and seniors housing is especially important to consider in discussing occupancy performance because the frailest elderly are often patients of skilled nursing’s higher acuity setting with around-the-clock nursing attention. And, it has been these elderly patients with significant pre-existing conditions that have seen the highest rates of COVID-19 incidence and fatalities.</p><p>Partially as a result, according to data from the NIC MAP® Data Service, the occupancy rate for skilled nursing properties fell more than other segment types with a 6.5 percentage point decline from the first quarter to 80.2 percent in the second quarter of 2020.</p><p>This was significantly more than the 2.8 percentage point drop in seniors housing properties to 84.9 percent, and, when the aggregated seniors housing category is broken down into its subcategories, there was a 3.2 percentage point decline seen in assisted living properties to 82.1 percent and a 2.4 percentage point decline in independent living properties to 87.4 percent from the first to second quarters.</p><p>This placed the occupancy rate for assisted living at its lowest level since NIC began reporting the data in late 2005. In general, residents in independent living tend to be healthier than those in assisted living and nursing care, and hence the lesser decline.</p><p>NIC MAP’s Intra-Quarterly data show further declines in occupancy beyond the second quarter. In the August report period, defined as the three-month rolling average June, July, and August, the assisted living occupancy rate was 79.5 percent, independent living was 85.6 percent, and nursing care was 76.5 percent.</p><p><em>Provider</em>: A big if, but if the pandemic is under control and vaccines available to all, what do you expect the occupancy outlook to be once this terrible time abates?</p><p>Mace: As you point out, the pandemic holds the cards. At this point, the outlook for the sector is tied to the path of the pandemic, its infection and penetration rate within properties, and the impact of the pandemic on broad economic growth. The seniors housing and nursing care industry as well as the broader national economy will be negatively affected by the COVID-19 virus until a vaccine is available and widely distributed. And, whenever that happens, I do not believe that we will go back to business-as-usual (BAU).</p><p><em>Provider</em>: What do you mean by not going back to BAU?</p><p>Mace: The new normal will not revert to the old normal, and the new normal is here now and will continue to evolve. Flexibility, responsiveness, and readiness are new standards for successful operators.</p><p>To answer your question directly, I believe that there is a transformational change in the seniors housing and care industry and that the change will continue to evolve. Occupancy will eventually return to pre-pandemic levels, but the industry will be changed.</p><p><em>Provider</em>: And, we have the demographics to consider?</p><p>Mace: Yes, more broadly, the underlying fundamentals and drivers of seniors housing remain in place. First, the demographics alone support the growing need for care and housing for seniors. Today, there are seven adult children aged 45 to 64 to care for every senior over the age of 80. By 2030, this ratio shrinks to 4:1, and, by 2050, it becomes 3:1. Fewer caregivers suggest that community-based congregate settings will be needed more than ever.</p><p>Second, with nearly two of every three properties built before 2000, the inventory of seniors housing properties is relatively old, and often a property refresh is needed for design, functionality, and efficiency. And, as obsolescence increases, new supply is needed at least in some markets. Moreover, COVID may have accelerated obsolescence, as building design is moving front and center for improved safety and health outcomes.</p><p>Third, seniors housing is increasingly recognized as a critical part of the solution for population health management and health care cost containment—a growing social, economic, and political reality.</p><p><em>Provider</em>: Any other factors in play for occupancy recovery and trends post-pandemic?</p><p>Mace: The need for care and housing is especially acute for middle-income seniors. NIC’s Forgotten Middle study highlights that point, with only 46 percent of middle-income seniors capable of affording seniors housing and care by 2029. It’s likely that, as a result of the pandemic and the secondary impact it has had on the economy, more Americans than ever will slip into the Forgotten Middle-income cohort, making the need for affordable care and housing ever more pressing.<br></p> | Provider poses a series of questions to NIC’s Beth Burnham Mace on issues tied to the COVID-19 pandemic and occupancy levels across the seniors housing sector. | 2020-10-20T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Articles/PublishingImages/740%20x%20740/0920_News1.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | COVID-19 |