2022 Assisted Living State Regulatory Review | https://www.providermagazine.com/Issues/2022/NovDec/Pages/2022-Assisted-Living-State-Regulatory-Review.aspx | 2022 Assisted Living State Regulatory Review | <p><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/JillSchewe.jpg" alt="Jill Schewe" class="ms-rtePosition-2" style="margin:5px;width:200px;height:200px;" />Assisted living (AL) regulations, statutes, and policies in 33 states were updated between 2020 and 2022, according to the National Center for Assisted Living’s (NCAL) 2022 edition of the Assisted Living State Regulatory Review.</p><p>“States continue to demonstrate their ability to respond to the evolving assisted living environment, foster quality improvement, support transparency for consumers, and maintain resident safeguards,” said LaShuan Bethea, NCAL Executive Director. </p><h3>What is the Assisted Living State Regulatory Review?</h3><p>The 2022 NCAL State Regulatory Review is a state-by-state report of assisted living regulations, recent legislative activity, and an overview of key regulatory topics that our members and stakeholders find important. For every state and the District of Columbia, this report provides information on topics such as how state agencies license assisted living (including those units with Alzheimer’s or other dementias), recent legislative and regulatory updates affecting AL, and requirements for resident agreements, admission, and termination, staffing and training—among other topics.</p><p>Historically, NCAL has published this report annually, but because of the public health emergency with COVID-19, the report is now available again after a two-year hiatus.</p><h3>Why is this a valuable resource for AL providers?</h3><p>Since regulations for AL are established and enforced at the state level, there is not a great resource for people to access individual state AL regulations. NCAL has created such a document with this publication. It is exciting to not only have the information in one place but also to be able to use it in multiple ways, including cross-referencing information between states and following state regulation activity. </p><h3>What are some of the key themes/takeaways in this report?</h3><p>It was no surprise to see that 65 percent of the states reported regulatory or legislative changes in 2020, 2021, or 2022 that impact AL residents, staff, and facility structures. These legislative changes affected a variety of requirements, including licensure, staff training, infection control, and residents’ rights.<br>With such significant activity in state regulatory changes, now: <br></p><ul><li>Forty-six states and the District of Columbia (92 percent) require a consumer disclosure, agreement, and/or bill of rights for residents. </li><li>All 50 states and the District of Columbia require a form of resident assessment and, at minimum, provide activities of daily living (ADL) for residents. </li><li>Forty-nine states and the District of Columbia (98 percent) have provisions around, and allow, providing medication management to residents.</li><li>Forty-five states and the District of Columbia (90 percent) have minimum educational and/or training requirements for AL administrators/directors.<br></li></ul><p>It is clear from the trends we have seen over the years that state regulations continue to increase in AL. States are making changes as they determine how to best serve their specific resident populations in the years ahead, and we anticipate this trend will continue.</p><h3>Where can I access the report?</h3><p>The full report can be found on the NCAL website at <a href="http://www.ahcancal.org/Assisted-Living/Policy/Pages/state-regulations.aspx">www.ahcancal.org/Assisted-Living/Policy/Pages/state-regulations.aspx</a>. <br></p><h3>Who should I contact with questions?</h3><p>For further questions, email <a href="mailto:ncal@ncal.org">ncal@ncal.org</a>. <br><br><em>Jill Schewe, LALD, is the director of policy and regulatory affairs for the National Center for Assisted Living (NCAL). </em></p> | It is exciting to not only have the information in one place but also to be able to use it in multiple ways. | 2022-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/JillSchewe.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | Assisted Living | Spotlight on Assisted Living |
Be Prepared for the Shift to Population Health | https://www.providermagazine.com/Issues/2022/NovDec/Pages/Be-Prepared-for-the-Shift-to-Population-Health.aspx | Be Prepared for the Shift to Population Health | <p><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/MikeCheek.jpg" alt="Mike Cheek" class="ms-rtePosition-2" style="margin:5px;width:108px;height:135px;" />Under traditional care arrangements, health care providers are reimbursed for the services provided. It is a patient by patient, treatment-based, reactive approach. For example, skilled nursing facilities are responsible for single-benefit, skilled care under Medicare part A. This is a specific situation where care and therapies are all aimed at rehabilitating the patient to levels of function prior to surgery, an accident, etc. <br></p><p>On the other hand, population health management (PHM) is a data-driven, holistic approach to care delivery and patient outcomes of a group of individuals, whether that cohort be defined based on the setting (i.e., nursing facility or assisted living) or chronic condition (i.e., dementia, COPD, etc.) or other feature. This “managed” care model means that everything from doctor visits to medication to specialty services—and the interactions between them—is governed from a proactive, preventative, and coordinated standpoint. This type of value-based care model rewards operators that improve care and reduce costs. Residents in skilled nursing facilities and long term care facilities receive higher quality, more timely care and a better overall experience, and the government achieves its goal of reducing per capita cost.</p><h3>Moving from Fee-for-Service to PHM </h3><p>The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and states are heavily focused on moving from fee-for-service and payment by volume to value-based care and PHM models, thereby also driving health plans, health systems, and physicians groups down this path. Being able to understand and adopt population health approaches is critical if long term care providers want to move upstream in the health care reimbursement food chain. For example, Medicare Advantage in 33 states grew by double digits, and there are states where Medicare fee-for-service is irrelevant. Over the last 20 years, the over-65 population has gradually migrated to managed care.<br></p><p>Adopting a PHM model benefits facilities by capturing more dollars for care, being efficient with those dollars to achieve high-quality outcomes, and allowing a range of risks for costs. There providers can have their own plan or partner on shared savings or other value-based reimbursement arrangements. </p><h3>AHCA/NCAL’s Population Health Summit</h3><p>A key step is understanding the PHM options and potential paths to engagement. AHCA/NCAL’s Population Health Summit will be held on December 7-8, 2022, at the Gaylord National Harbor in Maryland and offers long term care providers further exploration, solutions, and opportunities in PHM. This summit will equip providers with the first steps to move away from the fee-for-service environment and into managing the whole person. <br></p><p>The summit features sessions for providers just entering the space, those well into the space, and those looking to create local and regional relationships. Networking is vital because the regional nature of PHM models relies upon a variety of plan owners, provider networks, and even part owners. Additionally, it is an opportunity for providers to share best practices of managed care to improve quality care and the overall experience for residents. There will be sessions specifically for independent owners and assisted living operators as well.<br></p><p>There will be education on all levels of risk, from launching an institutional special needs plan, being involved in sub-capitation payment plans, or joining a preferred provider contract with an accountable care organization. This will allow attendees to find the right path at the right time for them to take on risk bearing and PHM approaches.<br></p><p>Dr. Mark McClellan, a former CMS administrator, will deliver the opening keynote. His research at Duke University’s Margolis School for Public Health about PHM models has been forward thinking and innovative. The closing keynote will be the deputy director for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Ellen Lukens, talking about the innovation center’s vision for acute and long term care providers in their approaches to moving away from fee-for-service and to paying for value of care. </p><h3>Don’t Be Left Behind </h3><p>Traditional fee-for-service is largely going to be gone by 2030, replaced by a system that holds providers accountable through partial and total cost of care models for quality and outcomes. If you’ve not started to think through how you will function either as a meaningfully engaged partner in a value-based reimbursement environment or a risk-bearing entity, you’re going to be at a very serious disadvantage. <br><br><em>Mike Cheek is senior vice president for reimbursement and market strategy at AHCA/NCAL. Cheek and the reimbursement team work on traditional Medicare and Medicaid issues as well as with members to move into new, innovative PHM approaches.</em></p> | PHM is a data-driven, holistic approach to care delivery and patient outcomes of a group of individuals. | 2022-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/PHM.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | Population Health Management | Population Health Management |
Maximize the DNS’s Role to Succeed in Value-Based Care | https://www.providermagazine.com/Issues/2022/NovDec/Pages/Maximize-the-DNSs-Role-to-Succeed-in-Value-Based-Care-.aspx | Maximize the DNS’s Role to Succeed in Value-Based Care | <p><img src="/Issues/2021/July/PublishingImages/AlexisRoam.jpg" alt="Alexis Roam" class="ms-rtePosition-1" style="margin:5px;width:108px;height:135px;" />The director of nursing services (DNS) plays a pivotal role in the success of a skilled nursing facility (SNF). As the leader of clinical care and services, the DNS drives the public ratings and overall performance of the quality of nursing care of a SNF, which impact census. Referral sources, including hospitals, form partnerships with SNFs based on this performance. Moreover, people base their selection of which SNF they will patronize based upon public ratings and the partnerships with hospitals. In addition, most of the regulatory and legal risks assumed by the SNF are related to nursing care. With so much at stake already, and with health care shifting to a value-based care system, the quality of nursing care and the significance of the DNS’s role in leading it are more important than ever. </p><h3>Expectation of a DNS</h3><p>The DNS is often chosen because they possess in-depth knowledge of the normal changes of aging and can care for elders as they navigate the relationship between wellness and aging, proving they excel as a gerontological registered nurse (RN). This is demonstrated by their ability to promote the elder’s strengths to foster wellness while simultaneously addressing the elder’s needs as age advances and/or disease and illness are experienced. The expectation is the DNS will replicate the same level of excellence they provided individually throughout the nursing department by leading the development and implementation of systems of nursing care that consistently produce desired outcomes. However, fulfillment of this expectation is not achieved when the DNS is underutilized in their main role.</p><h3><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/caregiving1.jpg" class="ms-rtePosition-2" alt="" style="margin:5px;width:200px;height:200px;" />Underutilization of a DNS</h3><p>A DNS is underutilized when they are expected to assume responsibility for a job that does not require their expertise and can be completed by someone else. For example, the staffing coordinator position is vital to the operations of the SNF, but it does not require the skills of a DNS. Underutilization also occurs when the DNS is included in the staffing float pool and consistently fills open shifts as a certified nurse aide (CNA) or charge nurse. Although each of these roles is essential, they do not require the skills of the DNS and take away from the DNS’s time to effectively provide clinical leadership. <br></p><p>Despite the DNS’s best attempts to juggle the expectations as the leader of clinical care and services as well as the other responsibilities outside the scope of the DNS, the workload overwhelms them. At this point, the DNS makes a choice—they quit because success as the leader of clinical care and services can’t be achieved or stay but prioritize the non-DNS responsibilities over the DNS responsibilities. <br></p><p>A SNF will go to great lengths to secure an RN with the talents and skills to be the DNS, including offering an appealing benefits and compensation package; however, the contradiction of hiring a DNS, but then not fully utilizing them in that capacity becomes apparent when considering the return on investment. The table, to the right, shows two examples of the breakdown in salary of a SNF paying a DNS to spend between 40 and 50 percent of their time engaged in non-DNS tasks. The decision to underutilize a DNS in their main role greatly diminishes the productivity of the one person hired to complete DNS tasks; thus, the investment in the DNS has a poor return.</p><h3>Maximize the DNS Role </h3><p>The health care system is transforming to value-based care, and this means SNFs must be innovative in the methods used to consistently produce quality of care and life outcomes as efficiently as possible. While the staffing crisis and other challenges resulting from the pandemic have exacerbated the underutilization of DNSs, it is not a new trend. Nonetheless, this approach does not position a SNF to thrive in value-based care, because the DNS needs to be at the heart of managing clinical care and services so that the facility can produce the best outcomes in nursing care. Therefore, a paradigm shift is necessary to change perceptions and practices that maximize the DNS’s role, and also attract and retain RNs who can navigate the current turbulence and are capable of leading a nursing department that can thrive in value-based care. </p><h3>Recognize the DNS as a Leader</h3><p>Although it sounds simplistic, the first action management can take is to redefine what a DNS means to the SNF in a way that recognizes the significance of the role as the leader of clinical care and services, rather than just an RN who fulfills a regulatory requirement with a title. Areas the DNS should lead that enable success in value-based care include the implementation of evidence-based practice, development of other gerontological nurses and CNAs, collaboration with hospitals and other health care settings, fiscal and budgetary input and management, and the design of efficient systems that can consistently produce quality and maintain regulatory compliance. </p><p style="text-align:center;"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/caregiving_table1.jpg" alt="" style="margin:5px;width:604px;height:408px;" /><br></p><h3>Establish Expectations and Goals</h3><p>Expectations provide clarity as to what the DNS role entails and the operating guidelines to execute functions of the position. Expectations also hold management accountable to commit to the expectations they set forth for a DNS. Management will need to formulate a strategy that includes measurable goals and concrete action steps to transition from the old expectations to the new expectations. For example, if the DNS is covering shifts, a plan to stabilize staff is imperative. Goals encourage the DNS to be part of the strategy and communicate what the priorities are. This empowers the DNS to overcome the current tumult but also inspires the pursuit of high performance in the nursing department, including the critical need to recruit and retain staff. </p><p>Underutilization of the DNS is not new, but SNFs that want to thrive in value-based care must change this practice. Maximize the DNS role by valuing the significance of clinical leadership and the potential the DNS has to impact the success of the SNF. <br><br><em>Alexis Roam, MSN, RN-BC, DNS-CT, QCP, is a curriculum development specialist for the American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing (AAPACN). Roam can be reached at </em><a href="mailto:aroam@aapacn.org" target="_blank"><em>aroam@aapacn.org</em></a><em>.<br></em></p><p><em><br></em></p><p style="text-align:center;"><em><img src="/SiteCollectionImages/logos/AAPACN.jpg" alt="" style="margin:5px;width:200px;height:56px;" /><br></em></p><p style="text-align:center;"><em><br></em></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><span class="ms-rteForeColor-2">Learn more:</span></span></p><table class="ms-rteTable-default" width="100%" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center;"><tbody><tr><td class="ms-rteTable-default" style="width:33.3333%;"><a href="https://ahcapublications.org/products/the-long-term-care-director-of-nursing-field-guide-fourth-edition?_pos=1&_sid=d309a2a42&_ss=r" target="_blank"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/DNGuide.jpg" alt="The Long-Term Care Director of Nursing Field Guide, Fourth Edition" style="margin:5px;" /></a></td><td class="ms-rteTable-default" style="width:33.3333%;"><a href="https://ahcapublications.org/products/nursing-and-therapy-a-collaborative-approach-to-documentation-quality-and-payment-reform?_pos=4&_sid=d309a2a42&_ss=r" target="_blank"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/NursingTherapy.jpg" alt="Nursing and Therapy: A Collaborative Approach to Documentation, Quality, and Payment Reform" style="margin:5px;" /></a></td><td class="ms-rteTable-default" style="width:33.3333%;"><a href="https://ahcapublications.org/products/nurse-managers-guide-to-retention-and-recruitment?_pos=5&_sid=d309a2a42&_ss=r" target="_blank"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/Retention.jpg" alt="Nurse Manager's Guide to Retention and Recruitment" style="margin:5px;" /></a></td></tr></tbody></table><p></p> | The expectation is the DNS will replicate the same level of excellence they provided individually throughout the nursing department by leading the development and implementation of systems of nursing care that consistently produce desired outcomes. | 2022-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/caregiving2.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | Caregiving | Focus on Caregiving |
New PDPM LTC Trend Tracker Module Can Help with Medicare Compliance | https://www.providermagazine.com/Issues/2022/NovDec/Pages/New-PDPM-LTC-Trend-Tracker-Module-Can-Help-with-Medicare-Compliance.aspx | New PDPM LTC Trend Tracker Module Can Help with Medicare Compliance | <p>In October 2022, AHCA launched a new Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) module on the Long Term Care (LTC) TrendTracker (TT) platform that providers can use to monitor their Medicare Part A compliance risk. In this article, we will discuss why skilled nursing facility (SNF) Medicare compliance programs are important, where AHCA members can access the PDPM TT reports, what data are in the reports, and how the reports can be used for facility- or company-wide Medicare compliance programs.</p><h3>Why Are SNF PPS PDPM Compliance Programs Important?</h3><p>In October 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) switched the SNF prospective payment system (PPS) model from the resource-use-based RUG-IV model to the PDPM, which is primarily based on unique resident characteristics as coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment instrument.<sup>1</sup> In that rule, and in subsequent rulemaking,<sup>2,3,4,5</sup> CMS has emphasized that it is closely monitoring SNF payments and any associated changes in MDS coding that could suggest that providers are stinting on therapy services or reducing length of stays, inappropriately using concurrent and group therapies, or upcoding certain MDS items to achieve higher payments. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General is also conducting a study to determine whether Medicare payments to SNFs under PDPM comply with Medicare requirements.<sup>6</sup><br></p><p>Per CMS, Medicare contractors conduct medical review to prevent improper payments and protect the Medicare Trust Fund.<sup>7</sup> Medical reviews involve the collection and clinical review of medical records and related information to ensure that payment is made only for services that meet all Medicare coverage, coding, billing, and medical necessity requirements. Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) reviews are conducted by Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), the Supplemental Medical Review Contractor (SMRC), Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs), and others. <br></p><p>These activities are based on data analysis and other findings indicative of a potential vulnerability, and programs, such as Targeted Probe and Educate, focus on providers with outlier data patterns that could suggest improper billing.<sup>8</sup> Providers that have timely access to data that indicate their risk for audit can use this information in compliance programs to identify any potential issues and implement corrective measures to either reduce the risk of audit or to be best prepared to respond to an audit. </p><h3>What Specific PDPM Information Is Now Available in TT?</h3><p>The AHCA PDPM TT reports contain facility-specific trends for 37 key metrics being evaluated by CMS and medical review contractors to target for potential payment errors. The reports, derived from MDS data, allow providers to compare and benchmark metrics on a quarterly basis against peers within their organization, state, or nationwide. The data go back to the onset of PDPM in October 2019, and reports can be generated in both table and trend chart formats. <span><span><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/PDPM_Fig2.jpg" class="ms-rtePosition-2" alt="" style="margin:5px;" /></span></span></p><p>The PDPM TT Report Summary contains 10 high-level aggregate trends: Average Medicare Rate PPD (per patient day); the average CMI (case-mix index) value for each of the five PDPM case-mix adjusted components (physical therapy = PT, occupational therapy = OT, speech-language pathology = SLP, nursing, and non-therapy ancillary = NTA); the average Medicare length of stay; and the average PT, OT, and SLP minutes per stay. Figure 1 provides an excerpt of the PDPM Case-Mix Index Components portion of an example facility for the most currently available four quarters of MDS data as compared to the selected peer group. Footnotes are included as appropriate to provide additional detail about the data and/or provider audit risk. <br></p><p><span></span>If the facility’s results are higher or lower than their peers for these factors, and if the footnotes indicate a potential audit risk, then exploration of the additional 27 trends listed in the Report Detail may be useful in tracking down the MDS data elements that are driving the differences. Figure 2 summarizes the additional types of trend data available in the Report Detail. <br></p><p>The Report Detail screen also allows providers to obtain graphic drill-down of the measures with a longer look-back period. As demonstrated in Figure 3, the SLP CMI trends listed in Figure 1 are displayed in a bar chart comparing the facility’s quarterly average SLP CMI trends to the peer group for the most recent three years of available data. </p><h3>Using PDPM TT Reports for Compliance Efforts</h3><p>Having different average payment or MDS coding patterns from other providers doesn’t necessarily mean a provider is doing anything wrong, especially if the provider is treating a different patient population and is getting good quality outcomes. However, as discussed above, having different rates than peers for certain metrics being evaluated by claim auditors may increase a provider’s risk for audit and payment denial if the MDS coding is not supported by the clinical documentation. <br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/PDPM_Fig3.jpg" alt="" style="margin:5px;" /><br></p><p>For example, as shown in Figure 1, the facility had a higher SLP component average CMI than its peers, so looking at the PDPM TT Report Detail for the trends for various MDS items that impact the SLP component rates, such as cognition, SLP complexity, swallowing disorders, and mechanically altered diet, may be helpful in identifying the clinical characteristics driving the higher CMI value. Additionally, the TT drill-down report shown in Figure 3 can show if the difference from peers is a recent event or longstanding trend. <br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><img src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/PDPM_Fig1.jpg" class="ms-rtePosition-1" alt="" style="margin:5px;" /></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p style="text-align:center;"><br></p><p>Once a provider has identified the specific underlying MDS data items driving the differences, it will make it easier to focus internal chart audits to validate the accuracy of the coding and/or the completeness of the documentation supporting the coding. The results could then confirm whether the MDS coding is supported and defensible upon any future audit, or whether staff education efforts are necessary to assure the documentation and coding are appropriate.<em><br></em></p><p><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">References</span><br class="ms-rteFontSize-1"></em></p><ul><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">1 FY 2019 SNF PPS Final Rule 83 FR 39162, August 8, 2018 (<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/08/08/2018-16570/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/08/08/2018-16570/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">2 FY 2020 SNF PPS Final Rule 84 FR 38728, August 7, 2019 (<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/07/2019-16485/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/07/2019-16485/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">3 FY 2021 SNF PPS Final Rule 85 FR 47594, August 5, 2020 (<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/05/2020-16900/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/08/05/2020-16900/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">4 FY 2022 SNF PPS Final Rule 86 FR 42424, August 4, 2021 (<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/04/2021-16309/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/04/2021-16309/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">5 FY 2023 SNF PPS Final Rule 87 FR 47502, August 3, 2022 (<a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/03/2022-16457/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities" target="_blank">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/03/2022-16457/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">6 OIG Work Plan: Skilled Nursing Facility Reimbursement webpage (<a href="https://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/workplan/summary/wp-summary-0000575.asp" target="_blank">https://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/workplan/summary/wp-summary-0000575.asp</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">7 CMS Medical Review and Education webpage (<a href="https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/monitoring-programs/medicare-ffs-compliance-programs/medical-review" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/monitoring-programs/medicare-ffs-compliance-programs/medical-review</a>)</span></em></li><li><em><span class="ms-rteFontSize-1">8 CMS Targeted Probe and Educate webpage (<a href="https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/monitoring-programs/medicare-ffs-compliance-programs/medical-review/targeted-probe-and-educatetpe" target="_blank">https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/monitoring-programs/medicare-ffs-compliance-programs/medical-review/targeted-probe-and-educatetpe</a>) </span></em></li></ul><p><em>Daniel Ciolek is associate vice president, therapy advocacy, for the American Health Care Association.</em></p> | The reports, derived from MDS data,
allow providers to compare and benchmark metrics on a quarterly basis against peers within their organization, state, or nationwide. | 2022-11-01T04:00:00Z | <img alt="" src="/Issues/2022/NovDec/PublishingImages/PDPM.jpg" style="BORDER:0px solid;" /> | CMS | PDPM Update |